7 December 2021
Cheshire West and Chester Council’s Cabinet has agreed a policy on trail hunting which takes into account the threat posed by hunts to animals and the environment.
A cross-party working group was established to better understand the activity of trail hunting, to review the local evidence and the legal framework surrounding trail hunt activities.
Trail hunting is regarded as a hound-based activity where much of the emphasis is on watching the hounds work out where the scent has been laid in a way to simulate traditional hunting. The huntsman does not know exactly where the trails have been laid so the focus is on locating the laid scent using the hounds.
Cabinet agreed to:
A cross-party group met between March and November 2021 and considered evidence from significant landowners, interested groups and other local authorities. There was also a public call for written evidence to further inform the policy recommendation.
- prohibit trail hunting on land owned and controlled by Cheshire West and Chester Council;
- introduce a clause into any new farm tenancy agreements that trail hunting will not take place on land rented from Cheshire West and Chester Council;
- seek a voluntary agreement with existing tenant farmers that trail hunting will not take place on land rented from Cheshire West and Chester Council.
Councillor Karen Shore, Cabinet Member for Environment, Highways and Strategic Transport said: “There has been significant support for introducing this ban to prevent trail hunting to take place on Council owned land.
“We received details about a disregard for fields full of livestock causing damage to both the land and the stock, stress caused to ewes during lambing season risking lost lambs, gates left open allowing flocks to mix and gates removed form hinges. There was also a mention of padlocks cut to gain access to land, a hunt claiming they didn’t know ewes would be in lamb over winter months and a hunt stating that they are on land because they couldn’t be sure which way the fox would go.“
The call for evidence resulted in 933 email responses, with 915 (98 per cent) in favour of the ban and18 (2 per cent) against the ban.
The main reasons given in favour of the ban
The main reasons against the ban
- A risk to wildlife and/or endangered species (505 responses)
- Belief that trail hunting was a smokescreen for illegal hunting (463 responses)
- The risk of domestic animals being killed (422 responses)
- Stress caused to other animals including livestock and horses (280 responses)
- The risk to the hunt horses and hounds (264 responses)
- Hounds can spread disease – fouling (249 responses)
- Foxes being killed (243 responses)
- Trespassing on Private land (238 responses)
- Hounds on roads (224 responses)
- Want to protect the environment (217 responses)
The Council will continue to receive applications from hunting organisations in relation to temporary road closures to facilitate their lawful activity. These applications will continue to be processed by the Safety Advisory Group as for any other event. Any prohibition on trail hunting on Council owned and controlled land will not impact on the application for the use of the public highway.
- It’s a legal activity (11 responses)
- It’s the same as dog walking (8 responses)
- Brings people from different walks of life together (4 responses)
- Traditional country pursuit (4 responses)
- No greater danger to flora / fauna / environment than other activities (4 responses)
- Lots of local support (3 responses)
- Local businesses benefit (3 responses)
- It’s a one-sided agenda (3 responses)
- A serious reason is needed to ban it (3 responses)
- The hunts already liaise with CWCC (3 responses)
Discuss this article
Please see terms below before using this feature
Please be aware that the facility above is a Facebook service, posting your views will make some of your Facebook information visible to everyone (as with any Facebook activity).
The system administrators (VISAV Limited) monitor the content added. Any misuse or objectionable material should be reported to email@example.com
The views expressed do not represent the views of the system administrators who are VISAV Limited, the Police, Neighbourhood Watch and other Information Provider using this service. The System Administrators make no guarantee, endorsement and accept no liability, regarding the discussion service above, including, but not limited to, its availability, accuracy, currency, content, quality or lack of objectionable or offensive content.